Code security your board understands and your technical team respects.
Enterprise-level coverage without enterprise-level friction: more than 20 specialized analyzers, zero agents to install, and native integration with every Pull Request and every CI/CD pipeline.
The blind spot
Software security stopped being just a technology matter.
Every line of code your company writes today is a risk decision that someone, at some point, will have to explain to a client, a regulator, or a board.
Most executive committees do not have that picture: only the technical team has it, and only after something has already failed.
- Exposure with no clear owner. Code risk lives scattered across repositories and people, with no single owner reporting it upward.
- Growing regulatory pressure. ISO 27001, SOC 2, and PCI-DSS demand continuous evidence of secure development, not a once-a-year audit snapshot.
- Client and partner trust on the line. A security incident in the product is not just a technical problem: it is a brand problem and a contract problem.
- Third-party dependency with no knowledge transfer. Hiring a one-off expert solves the symptom once and leaves no capability installed in the team.
One product, every role
The same platform. A different argument for every seat at the table.
Innseal does not need to explain itself twice: the same data answers each role's question, in its own language.
Real coverage, not partial
Six risk categories, reinforced by an AI layer, with more than 20 engines on the same scan. No blind spots between code, dependencies, infrastructure, and secrets.
Nothing new to operate
100% agentless architecture: no agents, sensors, or extra infrastructure to deploy, update, or patch on your servers.
Without leaving the workflow
Findings arrive as a direct comment on the Pull Request, at the moment of the code, not in a 40-page PDF weeks later.
A trust argument
Demonstrable security for clients, partners, and auditors. A verifiable differentiator, not a promise in a sales proposal.
Business continuity
Code risk stops being a blind spot: it enters the same report where every other strategic risk already lives for the board.
Quantified exposure, not a surprise
Early risk visibility lowers the likelihood of unbudgeted costs from incidents, regulatory penalties, or lost contracts.
Technical scope
More than 20 analyzers. Six risk categories. An AI layer that reinforces them.
A single scan covers source code, dependencies, infrastructure as code, exposed secrets, the supply chain, and the application's runtime behavior.
Source code
Static analysis across multiple languages and frameworks, including enterprise stacks like Apex and Salesforce. More than 30 languages covered.
Dependencies
Dependency vulnerabilities with reachability analysis, which prioritizes the CVEs the code actually invokes, plus a third-party license inventory.
Infrastructure as code
Misconfigurations caught before they reach the cloud. Terraform, Bicep, ARM, and Kubernetes.
Runtime
Dynamic tests against the deployed application: injection, data exposure, and insecure configuration.
Exposed credentials
Credentials and API keys exposed in the source code, detected on every scan.
Supply chain
Dependency supply-chain risk, with an AI layer that reinforces every category with extra detection and remediation suggestions.
SCA reachability analysis determines whether a vulnerable library is actually executable in the code path and cuts noise by up to 70% versus raw CVE lists.
Innseal orchestrates multiple analyzers specialized by language and risk type in every category, which reduces false negatives compared to relying on a single engine. Estimated detection coverage by category:
| Category | Estimated coverage | Engines |
|---|---|---|
| SCA · CVEs in dependencies | 90-95% | 5 engines, several vulnerability databases |
| IaC · infra misconfigurations | 85-90% | 3 engines |
| Secret Scanning · credentials in code | 85-90% | 2 engines |
| SAST · source code | 55-65% | 7 engines, broad language coverage |
| DAST · runtime | 65-75% | 6 engines |
| Overall estimate | 75-82% | All categories combined |
The remaining 10 to 15% corresponds to business-logic and runtime-context vulnerabilities that no automated tool detects on its own: they require manual pentesting or specialized human review. Figures estimated from Innseal's operational experience and public industry benchmarks (May 2026); updated as new analyzers are added.
Frictionless architecture
It connects to what you already have. It does not ask you to change how you work.
Nothing to install, nothing to maintain, nothing to learn from scratch.
Innseal integrates directly into the workflow your team already uses every day.
100% agentless
No agents, sensors, or extra infrastructure to install, update, or patch on your servers. Innseal connects via SSH and webhook: it is a service, not a deployment.
Native in the PR
Automatic comment with prioritized findings directly on the Pull Request, before the merge, where the development team is already working.
Native in the pipeline
Activates inside the existing pipeline: diff scanning on every PR and full scanning on demand, without changing the team's workflow.
What the plan includes
Everything in one plan, with a fixed price per organization.
Detecting vulnerabilities is easy, closing them is the real problem.
Innseal includes what actually gets findings remediated.
DevSecOps expert included
A specialist available to guide remediation of every critical finding, with no additional professional services.
AI-assisted remediation
AI-generated corrective code suggestions, validated by the expert, attached automatically to the developer's ticket.
Tickets in any ITSM
Jira, ServiceNow, Monday, Asana, or another. A new integration ready in under two weeks, with two-way status sync.
Auditor-ready reports
OWASP Top 10 and CWE Top 25 dashboard, plus a downloadable PDF report for PCI-DSS v4.0 and ISO 27001:2022, with no manual work from the team.
SPDX license management
Classifies dependencies by license category with more than 50 SPDX identifiers, flags prohibited or restrictive licenses, and exports the inventory as CSV.
Fixed price, no surprises
SAST, SCA, IaC, Secrets, and DAST in a single plan. No per-developer cost, no line-of-code limit, no surprises on the invoice.
Innseal versus other products
The same as an enterprise product offers, without what makes it heavy and expensive.
Most code security platforms solve detection and leave the rest (remediation, compliance, integration) as separate modules, higher-tier plans, or professional services.
Innseal brings it all into one plan.
| Capability | Innseal | Other products |
|---|---|---|
| Analysis coverage | ||
| Analyzers per category | More than 20, several engines specialized by language and risk type | Usually one proprietary engine per category, or a handful of OSS analyzers |
| SCA reachability | Included in the base plan, cuts noise by up to 70% | Only in enterprise plans and for limited languages, or not available |
| SBOM on every scan | Generated automatically | Separate module or paid add-on |
| SAST languages | More than 30, including Apex and Salesforce | Broad coverage of popular ones, gaps in enterprise stacks |
| Integration and operation | ||
| Agents on your infrastructure | None: SSH and webhook | Require installing a CLI or agents inside the client's pipeline |
| ITSM integration | Jira, ServiceNow, Monday, Asana, or another; new integration in under two weeks, with two-way sync | Limited to Jira, or custom development per tool, or enterprise plan only |
| Scan on every Pull Request and pipeline | Native, included | Available, sometimes with extra setup from the team |
| Remediation | ||
| DevSecOps expert | Always included in the plan | Only in premium plan, or billed as separate professional services |
| AI suggestion on the ticket | Automatic and validated by the expert, delivered in the team's ITSM flow | Detection with no support, or a suggestion that never reaches the workflow |
| Secure-development training | OWASP Top 10 workshops included | Generic content or paid add-on |
| Compliance | ||
| PCI-DSS v4.0 and ISO 27001:2022 PDF report | Downloadable with one click | Paid add-on, or manual work from the team |
| OWASP Top 10 and CWE Top 25 dashboard | Automatic classification, retroactively recalculable | Static or partial classification |
| SPDX license management | Included, more than 50 identifiers, CSV export | Not included in the base plan |
| Commercial model | ||
| Price | Fixed per organization | Scales by developer, by active author, or by lines of code |
| Seat or code limit | No limit | Contracts with seat caps or line-of-code caps |
| Onboarding | Self-configuration in under 60 seconds | Guided implementation over days or weeks |
"Other products" describes typical behavior across the enterprise code security platform segment, based on their public documentation and Innseal's experience in evaluation processes. Concrete terms vary by vendor and by plan.
Our own methodology
M2DS: a maturity roadmap, not a list of technical alerts.
A scanner with no methodology and no expert support only generates noise.
Innseal does not sell an alarm: it sells the team learning not to need one.
- M2DS, the Secure Development Maturity Model, is a structured 12-month process.
- It is managed with milestones and owners, like any other strategic initiative that already reports to the board.
- Only 13% of detected vulnerabilities get remediated effectively without expert support and a structured methodology. M2DS exists to close that gap.
Assess
Initial diagnosis. The board sees, for the first time, the real risk of its code surface quantified.
Train
Practical training for the technical team on secure-development fundamentals, applied to the real findings.
Enable
Full analysis coverage activated. First round of remediation with expert support.
Integrate
The process becomes embedded in the team's workflow. Automatic checks on every PR and pipeline.
Operate
Process ready for external audit. The team develops securely by habit, with no operational dependency on Innseal.
Your team
- An executive sponsor and a technical owner designated from stage 1.
- Development team participation in the training and in the first round of remediation.
- Final say on findings prioritization: Innseal recommends, your team decides.
Innseal
- DevSecOps expert supporting every stage, not just delivering a report.
- Technical setup of the Pull Request and CI/CD integration.
- Progress report per stage, in the same language the board already uses.
A 12-month roadmap from zero visibility to an operational secure-development process, with evidence ready for audit at any time and installed capability inside the organization.
Code risk should not live only in a development team's backlog. It should live in the same report where financial, legal, and operational risk already lives.
Innseal's guiding principleGovernance
An agenda you already know, applied to a risk that was not being reported yet.
A single risk owner. Code security status gets an identifiable owner, with progress metrics over time.
Reporting in the board's language. Exposure indicators, maturity progress, and compliance, not technical tool jargon.
Permanent evidence, not an annual snapshot. Every decision and every finding stays on record to answer any audit or incident.
Reference frameworks
The evidence your audits already ask for.
Let's talk
A 30-minute conversation, focused on the business, not the tool.
We show you what your organization's code risk looks like in the board's language, and how M2DS takes it from zero visibility to audit-ready.
